[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Who says dromaeosaurs can't fly?

Is it just me, or is there actually little conflict between the neoflightless hypothesis and cladism? Greg Paul's tree in DA looks very similar to the results of many a phylogenetic analysis. The main argument seems to be about the position of _Archaeopteryx_. Big deal.

As a supporter of cladism and neoflightlessness I just don't see the problem. Phylogenetic analysis is currently the best tool we have for discovering phylogeny. It's not perfect, but many cladists are working to improve the method. And I think that phylogenetic analysis WILL be able to support neoflightlessness, if given enough fossils.

There seems to be unnecessary polarization over cladistics. We need to be building bridges, not burning them. Neoflightlessness doesn't require ANY rearrangement of cladograms, if you think about it.

Anyway, that's my 2c...

John Conway, Palaeoartist

"All art is quite useless." - Oscar Wilde

Systematic ramblings: http://homepage.mac.com/john_conway/
Palaeoart: http://homepage.mac.com/john_conway/_palaeoart.html