[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Spinosaurid Synonymy
Mike Keesey (email@example.com) wrote:
<So do they have _Baryonyx tenerensis_, or do they consider _tenerensis_ a
synonym of _walkeri_?
That would certainly seem to do it for _Cristatusaurus_.>
The authors do the following: agree with Charig and Milner, 1997, in
that *Cristatusaurus* represents a nearly identical morphology to England
*Baryonyx*, so that it is essentially *B.* ps. or *B. walkeri*. They
consider *Suchomimus* a species of *B.*, *B. tenerensis*. They alos lament
on the lack of access (cast or institutional) to *Angaturama* but pretty
much conclude that *A.* is the same as *I.*, but does not pertain to the
same specimen. They were also able to locate the approximate locality for
*I.*, Buxexé near the Chapada do Cairiri, by Dave Martill showing a photo
of the unprepared skull to various local collectors. It would be nice to
find the rest of the specimen, but thanksully nothing more irritating
about *Irritator* has been discovered ... except limitation to access to
Jaime A. Headden
Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to making leaps
in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to do. We should all
learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world around us rather than zoom by it.
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!