[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Kritosaurus australis (was Re: Carnotaurus)
I just wondered whether _K. navajovius_ & _K. australis_ are similar enough
to warrant placing them in the same genus. (Yup, it's the same ol' genus
debate thing again...) But _K. navajovius_ is a nomen dubium right? And
while we're at it, what happened to _Naashoibitosaurus_ & _Anasazisaurus_?
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Nick Gardner" <email@example.com>
Subject: Kritosaurus australis (was Re: Carnotaurus)
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 11:00:20 -0500
Ivan Kwan wrote-
By the way, what is the age of _"Kritosaurus" australis? And is it
different from _Secernosaurus koerneri_?
According to Bonaparte & Rougier, it was "of Late Cretaceous age, probably
restricted to the Campanian - Maastrichtian".
Also, why do you place "Kritosaurus" in quotes? Do you doubt it being of
I have the paper for Bonaparte & Rougier's "The Late Cretaceous Fauna of Los
Alamitos, Patagonia, Argentina, VII, The Hadrosaurs". However, it does not
state what year it was published. Could somoene post onlist the complete
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
Download Norah Jones, Eminem and more! http://www.msn.com.sg/ringtones/