[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Some questions & feathered Allosaurs?

> From: "Simon M. Clabby"
> Also, I was under the impression that Psittacosaurs
> were considered by some workers to not bee ancestral
> to Neoceratopians, as they had only four digits on the
> manus, whereas the quadrupedal Neoceratopians all had
> five digits on the manus, so the Triceratops of your
> art would not need to look like a porcupine, or have I
> completely misunderstood my phylogenetics again?.

Thing is, full integument is not preserved for any neoceratopsian (although
scale impressions are known for some ceratopsids, I believe). So it could be
anything from a trait within _Psittacosauridae_ to a basal trait within
_Ornithischia_. (Or, if homologous with feathers, within _Dinosauromorpha_. Or,
if homologous with "ptero-fur", ancestral to _Ornithodira_!) And, in any case,
it could have been secondarily lost in some lineages.

I would suspect something closer to the former than to the latter for now, but
who knows?

=====> T. Michael Keesey <keesey@bigfoot.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more