[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: the chinese Mesozoic Aves tree
David Marjanovic wrote-
> > Could these be due to poor illustrations, crushing and/or
> > breakage? Absolutely. Which is why I've been pondering how misleading
> > including Hou's taxa of crap could be for my analysis...
> Perhaps you should code everything you don't trust "?".
I actually plan on doing something like this, which is why I always write
down the source for my codings (part of the reason it takes forever for me
to code everything). Once I get it "complete", I'll experiment running it
with all the data, data excluding the codings I got from matrices, data
excluding the codings I got from matrices I subjectively don't trust, data
excluding the codings I got from literature I subjectively don't trust, and
combinations of those.
> IMHO this character could be a bit too volatile to include in an
> but of course that's subjective. And once you have your expected 400, that
> one won't do damage...
Eh, my philosophy is try everything and let PAUP sort through the noise. :-)