[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Status of Anasazisaurus, Naashoibitosaurus, Maleevosaurus and Saurophaganax

> From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> Mike Taylor
> Dear HPs,
> I wonder if any anyone can comment on the current status of the
> following genera?
>       Anasazisaurus and Naashoibitosaurus (=? Kritosaurus)
>       Maleevosaurus (=? Tarbosaurus)
>       Saurophaganax (=? Allosaurus)
> Are these referrals generally accepted?  And does anyone have refs for
> the referals?

I won't speak for the hadrosaurids (although I buy them as Kritosaurus!),
but all recent work on tyrannosaurids includes Maleevosaurus as a juvenile
Tarbosaurus. The Saurophaganax situation has less agreement: some (e.g.,
Smith) consider it as A. maximus; others as a distinct taxon.  I can say
that the most complete description of this taxon is in press, so folks
should wait for the paper.  (Wow, it's been awhile since I wrote that!)

                Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
                Vertebrate Paleontologist
Department of Geology           Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland          College Park Scholars
                College Park, MD  20742
Phone:  301-405-4084    Email:  tholtz@geol.umd.edu
Fax (Geol):  301-314-9661       Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796