[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: diminutive dinosaurs



> I wasn't suggesting it as an equivalent question, but as a more
interesting
> question. The node of Clade _Aves_ (sensu lato) is no longer terribly
> significant, now that its boundaries have been blurred by newer
discoveries.
> Indeed, most times people say "non-avian dinosaur" they would be better
off
> saying, e.g., "extinct dinosaur", "Mesozoic dinosauromorph", "non-avialan
> dinosaur", "non-neornithean dinosauromorph", "nonvolant dinosauromorph",
or
> some other phrase that relates more specifically to the topic at hand.

Wwwwell. If I won't personally convince Gauthier (and de Queiroz?)
otherwise, or if nobody else will present a definition of *Aves* at the
congress in July, the PhyloCode will give *Aves* a crown-group definition.