[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
--- Morgan Churchill <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> you would be surprised I think. I am not really fond of the concept of
> picking up a good book in the future on paleontology and seeing the revised
> species names replacing all the old familar ones.
I picked Method M because there *is* no real revising. You simply cite the
literature when you wish to distinguish between homonymous trivial nomina,
optionally specifying a clade address as well (in essence the same as a
binomial). Aside from the clade address being optional, and the citation being
required at least once, there is no real orthographic difference. I haven't
renamed anything (which, as an amateur enthusiast publishing only on the
Internet, would be the height of pretentiousness), nor have I invalidated the
customary form of writing species. You still have your _Tyrannosaurus_ _rex_,
your _Triceratops_ _horridus_, etc.
=====> T. Michael Keesey <email@example.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.