[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Naive WAIR Question
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:30:07 -0800
> From: "James R. Cunningham" <email@example.com>
> > Isn't there also something in the morphology of extant avian
> > feathers that inherently suits them for generating upthrust? I am
> > no expert, but I seem to recall that the cross-sectional profile
> > of a flight feather is curved in much the same way as the wing
> > itself. Is this a correct recollection? If so, then you'd think
> > that those WAIRing dinobirds that were best adapted for WAIRing
> > would be precisely those that were _least_ adapted for flight.
> The feather curvature doesn't affect the slope of the lift curve.
> Only the aoa for zero lift, and to some extent, the drag. I don't
> see it as a big deal. And it only has those effects when the
> feathers are seperated and the flow is also transverse to the
> feather (roughly parallel to the chord). Note that hummingbirds
> generate lift on both the 'down' and 'up' strokes by partially
> inverting their wings.
However, my broader question still stands. I don't see that
adaptation for WAIR, in which wings are used to produce downthrust,
would pre-adapt an animal for flight, in which they are used to
produce upthrust. As Jeff's New Scientist article has pointed out
(presumably from the paper -- I don't have access to it so I can't say
for sure), WAIRing birds are performing a fundamentally different
action from flying birds, their wings moving in a plane at 90 degrees
to that of flight.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ I knew the world was going badly wrong when they started
putting "SKIP FLASH INTRO" buttons on ATMs.
Now available: _Child's Play_, my wife Fiona's CD of kids' music.
Download free sample tracks; buy on-line or by mail-order.