[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Aspect ratio and screaming dromies
I'm sorry, I don't know what your response means. In flight mechanics,
aspect ratio is defined as wingspan squared divided by the wing area.
In your description below, do you insert body mass into the equation in
place of the wingspan or the wing area? Once you do so, is the answer
still considered to be a representation of aspect ratio?
Jaime A. Headden wrote:
> Jim Cunningham (email@example.com) wrote:
> <Aren't these two different things? Should we use the same word to refer
> to both without some additional clarification? Particularly since in
> flight mechanics, the phrase 'aspect ratio' has a very precise meaning
> that isn't directly related to the general shape of the wing.
> When I was using aspect ratio, this was largely in use of the relative
> low 5.77 ratio of *M. gui* in relation to body size, as in
> *Archaeopteryx*. Then I used it to refer to the size of the wings in
> relation to body mass in eagles and swans, but do not consider shape to be
> a part of this. That was a separate consideration.