[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
I would strongly disagree(!) with making Daspletosaurus and Tarbosaurus
subgenera of Tyrannosaurus.
I have to agree with George here. In general, I think erecting subgenera
is bad policy for fossil taxa; if a species is good enough to be a subgenus,
why not go the whole hog and give it its own genus?
Of course, it all comes down to how finely calibrated your "generico-meter"
is, but _Daspletosaurus_ and _Tarbosaurus_ look like "good" genera to me.
On a subjective note, I wouldn't be sad to see _Jenghizkhan_ resurrected as
a genus, since it's a darn cool name IMHO, especially when juxtaposed with
_bataar_. In the same vein, I despised the name _Dinotyrannus_.
(Terrible tyrant??!! Is there any other kind of tyrant?)
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.