[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Ornithopoda + (Heterodontosauridae + Marginocephalia) phylogeny
--- Tim Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
> Tom Holtz wrote:
> However, I don't know how Ornithopoda is defined - is it stem-based or
> node-based, and if node-based is _Heterodontosaurus_ one of the anchor
> taxa? If it is, and Heterodontosauridae and Marginocephalia form a clade,
> then pachies and ceratopsians would all become ornithopods. Looks like
> another job for Mike... :-)
Sereno 1998 defined it as Clade(_Heterodontosaurus_ + _Parasaurolophus_). I'm
not aware of any other formal definitions in the literature. (_Euornithopoda_
was defined as Clade(_Parasaurolophus_ <- _Heterodontosaurus_) in the same
So, yes, under this definition, _Ornithopoda_ could include pachycephalosaurs
(not so objectionable), psittacosaurids (somewhat objectionable, but it's been
done before), and neoceratopsians (pretty objectionable). Personally, I feel
these definitions should be revised. A stem-based _Ornithopoda_ and a
node-based _Euornithopoda_ would be very useful.
Incidentally, I don't have the paper, but I *think* it may have defined
_Heterodontosauridae_ as Clade(_Heterodontosaurus_ <- _Parasaurolophus_), which
could also include pachies and ceratopsians. I could be wrong, though.
=====> T. Michael Keesey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!