[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
A Matter of Prospective (was Re: JP4 plot synopsis)
I hope no one minds if I get a few things off my chest about this whole ?Sick
Triceratops & Brachiosaurus? business. Primarily, we must remember that the
topic is the fourth installment of the MOVIE series, and not a new BOOK. My
point being that the books and the movies are two different mediums, and I did
not feel the certain plot points and/or happenstances from the Michael Crichton
novel NOT adapted into the Steven Spielberg film had any relevance. I think it
is unwise to use the book, as reference material to the movie, when the movie
is changed and edited on the whims of Steven Spielberg, and not pertaining to
preserving continuity with the book. We should remember that Steven Spielberg
began storyboarding the movie before even reading the book (well, at least the
first sight of the Brachiosaur.)
Now, to my knowledge, West Indian Lilac was never DEFINITIVELY
identified in the MOVIE as the cause of the sick Triceratops as well as the
Brachiosaurus. The fact that this was the case in the book seems a moot point
as, once again, we are talking about two differing versions.
The best analogy I could use to support my point would be thus: The
vast discrepancy between Tolkien?s Middle Earth, and Peter Jackson?s Middle
Earth. If you were to use the chapters containing Tom Bombadil, Old Man
Willow, and the Barrow Whites in an argument about the movie, it would hold no
water as in Peter Jackson?s Middle Earth, these simply do not exist.
More over, when I said the concept of a Dino Disease was ?Original,? I
was talking about the MOVIES. It sounded like an original and entertaining
concept for the MOVIE.
Thanks for letting me get that off my chest, I feel much better now. I
felt the need to defend myself.
That is it, so now, back to the relevant discussions about actual,
Sign up for Internet Service under $10 dollars a month, at