[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: And the Largest Theropod Is....
Mickey Mortimer wrote:
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus Stromer 1915
(IPHG 1912 VIII 19, destroyed) (~17.4 m, 12-19 tons) maxillary fragment,
incomplete dentary, nineteen teeth, two incomplete cervical vertebrae,
dorsal vertebrae (190-210 mm), dorsal ribs, gastralia, eight caudal centra
(MNHN SAM 124) (~15.9 m, 9-15 tons) (skull ~2 m) partial premaxillae,
partial maxillae, vomers, dentary fragment (Taquet and Russell 1998)
The largest named theropod, and probably the largest known.
Did Stromer provide linear measurements for *all* the elements, including
the cranial material? This could be important, because (as I'm sure you
know) the association of all this material into a single species has been
questioned. Oliver Rauhut, for one, has suggested that the holotype for _S.
aegyptiacus_ is a composite. But, if the dentary and vertebrae both come
from a stupendously-sized theropod, it would bolster the case that the
holotype probably represents one individual, and therefore a single species.
While it is possible that two 17m-long theropods might turn up in one
site, it must be rated as highly unlikely.
P.S. Nice work, Mickey.
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.