[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Re : For you T. Rex addicts out there! - Part 2
From: Steve <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Why does it *HAVE* to be one or the other?
Because, unfortunately, settling for the middle-man argument doesn't raise
much controversy and therefore doesn't bring in the funding. These
dichotomies we're always hearing about in science aren't a coincidence;
they're there because pitting one side against another attracts attention
(and money). People don't want to hear that all paleontologists have
finally agreed that the dinosaurs were finally wiped out by the combination
of an asteroid, disease, sea transgression, etc. They want to hear about
Jack Horner and Bob Bakker duking it out at an SVP meeting over the feeding
habits of the tyrannosaurs! That's why this debate rages on.
Undergraduate Student, Carleton University
Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoecology
AIM: jslice mallon
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.