[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
In a message dated 6/16/03 1:13:03 AM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< Linnean taxonomy is actively wrong, though; it's based on frankly
creationist assumptions. (Could hardly have been otherwise, considering
when it got started.) >>
These have since been discarded, of course. For a nice recent account of
Linnean versus cladistic classifications, see Mayr & Bock, 2002,
and other ordering systems," J Zool Syst Evol Research 40: 169-194.
Cladists will have plenty to scream about in this paper.