[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Reconstruction...? restoration...?



As I understand it, a reconstruction is simply a reassembly of the bones, as they were in life.
A restoration is just a fleshed-out rendition, complete with muscle and skin, of the above skeletal reconstruction.


Jordan Mallon

Undergraduate Student, Carleton University
Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoecology

Website: http://www.geocities.com/paleoportfolio/
AIM: jslice mallon

From: "Roxton" <roxton@softhome.net>
Reply-To: roxton@softhome.net
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Reconstruction...? restoration...? Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:04:27 -0600


I'm sorry for this question that might seem shallow to most of you, but can
anybody tell me the difference between reconstruction and restoration of
dinosaurs? and where does scientific illustration fit in?

My idea is that reconstruction includes the whole process from doing a
bibliographical search, going around to places to sketch and photograph
fossil materials, doing clay models, etc, etc and that it can branch off
into painting and sculpting and scientific illustration would refer only to
painting, only that it occurs to me that scientific illustration also refers
to skeletal drawings and after all, aren't these called skeletal
_reconstructions_?


With respect to restoration, is it more related to the anatomical
reconstruction of the animal without including behavioral traits, habitat,
accompanying fauna and flora and such? or is it the other way around? are
these ecological aspects part of the reconstruction process or not?

Thanks

Roxton





_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail