[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaur Dreaming report 2003
> This is the first monotreme that shows evidence for the presence of any
> bone in the lower jaw besides the dentary. One of the three additional
> bones became part of the middle ear of all the living mammals.
> This means that the monotremes must have split apart from
> the common stock of marsupials and placentals
> at a primitive stage where the transition in
> function of this bone had not taken place.
> (assuming that monotremes have the same structure of inner ear bones);
Don't they? Living ones, I mean?
> or surely it's possible that Teinolophos represents a dead-end
> branch of monotremes that retained primitive charactersitics
> long after other monotreme species
> had already given rise to the placental/marsupial line?
This would mean that it's not a monotreme (and neither are the "other
> Just because it's a monotreme doesn't mean it is ancestral
> to modern monotremes (or placentals/marsupials for that matter).
It does mean that it is not ancestral to placentals + marsupials.
Thanks for the information on the sedimentology. :-)