[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Sufferin' Sauropods

From: Martin Baeker <martin@turtle.ifw.ing.tu-bs.de>
Date: Thu Oct 30, 2003  11:11:58  PM Australia/Canberra
: zone65@bigpond.com:

But surely they were more bottom-heavy - the upper half of the animal
was mostly neck. The CoG as determined by the parts above the waterline
would be quite well balanced, AFAIK?

This I don't understand: Wasn't your argument that they were instable, so
that their CoG was quite high? If the lower part of the body is removed,
the CoG *must* move upwards, obviously, and make them more unstable.

If OTOH they were so bottom-heavy, then I don't see the danger of toppling
over in any case.


I shouldn't have said bottom-heavy, they're middle-heavy. The way their legs are depicted in popular art, it seems they would have been unsupportable. I propose they had far more heavily-muscled legs than the gazelle-like limbs they're generally depicted with.

Peter Markmann