[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: DA reviews

Odd that the first review of DA that receives attention on the list is the 
Auk/ward pseudoscientific rant by Feduccia - no one else can contradict himself 
in the same text like he - when the book was already reviewed in The Times 
Literary Supplement, Ibis, Var Fagelvard, New Scientist, and Choice. The 
were generally favorable, although Pat Shipman's TLS discussion of the 
insectivore issue is misplaced. 

It is a good thing that Feduccia did not like the book, since if he actually 
liked it it would be a very bad thing. 

BTW, it is DA, not DOTA, just as it is PDW, not PDOTW.