[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: DA reviews
Odd that the first review of DA that receives attention on the list is the
Auk/ward pseudoscientific rant by Feduccia - no one else can contradict himself
in the same text like he - when the book was already reviewed in The Times
Literary Supplement, Ibis, Var Fagelvard, New Scientist, and Choice. The
were generally favorable, although Pat Shipman's TLS discussion of the
insectivore issue is misplaced.
It is a good thing that Feduccia did not like the book, since if he actually
liked it it would be a very bad thing.
BTW, it is DA, not DOTA, just as it is PDW, not PDOTW.