[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The pterosaur in the egg: a new report
Nomen nudum: A taxonomic name held to be invalid, because the taxonomic
group designated is not described or illustrated sufficiently for
recognition. The name has not yet been published with a proper
Further, to be considered valid, the name must be published in a form
that is widely and easily available to the masses. I don't know if
_Prehistoric Times_ fulfills that criterium.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:05:58 -0400 Brad McFeeters
> >From: Tim Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >Reply-To: email@example.com
> >To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >Subject: Re: The pterosaur in the egg: a new report
> >Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:45:55 -0500
> >Pete Buchholz wrote:
> >>Dave Peters wrote on his website:
> >><<Avgodectes pseudembryon>>
> >>Uh... are you actually naming this in Prehistoric Times?
> >*grabbing my head with both hands*
> >NO!!! NO!!!!! Say it isn't so!!!!!
> >PLEASE - not another nomen nudum! I hate 'em!
> Why is it a nomen nudum?
> Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft®
> Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get
> first two months FREE*.
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!