[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "Lessons from a Tyrannosaur.."
Hear! Hear! I agree
Kenneth Carpenter, Ph.D.
Curator of Lower Vertebrate Paleontology &
Dept. of Earth Sciences
Denver Museum of Natural History
2001 Colorado Blvd.
Denver, CO 80205
>>> Dann Pigdon <firstname.lastname@example.org> 07/Jan/04 >>>
> "Given multiple explanations for a phenomenon, we scientists prefer the
Even if it's usually the wrong one. Personally, I'd modify Occam's razor
The simplest explanation is usually THE BEST PLACE TO START. Natural
systems are rarely, if ever, simple. Start by trying to prove (or
falsify) the simplest explanations, then move on to more complex
theories - even if you've apparently 'proven' the simple one.
Remember the old wave verses particle debate for light? One group
designed experiments to test whether light was a wave, and managed to
prove that theory. The other group did the same for light as a stream of
particles, and also proved their theory. Just proving a theory does not
necessarily mean that other theories should not be investigated. Until
you can prove just one theory and falsify all others, you haven't really
finished the research.
Dann Pigdon Australian Dinosaurs:
GIS / Archaeologist http://www.geocities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia http://www.alphalink.com.au/~dannj/