[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
I agree with you that the post-K-T hydrologic cycle may have been pretty
screwed up. But to think of the entire K-T earth as one big erosional
surface is similar to the *reationist belief that the whole earth was at
one time entirely flooded.
I can see where my comment could be misinterpreted.
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:55:14 -0800 "James R. Cunningham"
> Phil Bigelow wrote:
> > To claim that the K-T boundary clay is everywhere a lag deposit
> > analogous to claiming that there was a world-wide catastrophic
> > (and we don't want to go there).
> Why not go there?. Major catastrophic flooding (though not as a
> event) could be expected to continue for quite some time after the
> event. Note that I'm not implying that the boundary clay is
> a lag deposit; I'm adressing a somewhat different issue.
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!