[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
"Jaime A. Headden" wrote:
> Dewey McLean (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> <Impactors claim that the Chicxulub impact occurred 65 million years ago.
> The initial phase of Deccan Traps volcanism occurred somewhat _earlier_
> than K-T boundary time.>
> This argument of dating was one of the reasons why I commented upon
> accuracy of dating...
Indeed. How can we say with certainty that the Deccan Traps started
spewing forth around a million years before the Chicxulub impact (that's
one figure I've seen), when surely any radiometric dates of both will
have standard deviations in the order of at least a million years (I
would expect)? Do the dates for both events actually overlap with two
standard deviations (or possibly put them even further apart)? Or are
non-radiometric dating methods employed to compare the two events
I've seen one date for Chicxulub of 64.98 +/- 0.05 MYA. Is it possible
to have such a small standard deviation (just 50,000 years) on a date of
this age? I've seen Thermoluminescence dates that, with two std dev,
range from between yesterday and 120,000 years ago!
Dann Pigdon Australian Dinosaurs:
GIS / Archaeologist http://www.geocities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia http://www.alphalink.com.au/~dannj/