[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Martin and furcular homology
--- Sean ? wrote:
>Now, im no fan of Martin's work on avian origins, but
>surely he cannot be
>saying that, on the one hand, that the furculae are
>theropods lack interclavicles, and on the other, that
> they're non-homologous because
>Is Martin just sinking deeper, or am I missing something?
Well, it's possible that he simply changed opinion. The only papers I have on
furculae do not discuss the hypocleidium, so I cannot comment further on the
above, sadly. Wasn't Martin rumoured to have possibly recently switched sides
in the avian origins debate?
Need a new email address that people can remember
Check out the new EudoraMail at