[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: ptero endothermy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Bennett" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Dinosaur Listserver" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: ptero endothermy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Peters" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <email@example.com>; "dinosaur list" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:05 AM
> Subject: ptero endothermy
> > Chris Bennett wrote:
> > ...
> > One of the reasons why pterosaurs were connected to dinosaurs for so
> > long was the morphology of the pelvis. In both the anterior process of
> > the ilium can be quite substantial. Greg Paul is better acquainted with
> > this than I, but one can see that the early dinosaurs (theropods, and
> > prosauropods) had rather small ilia while later forms had extended ilia.
> > Longer ilia means larger thigh muscles.
> Unless David knows about some pterosaur mummies that I am unaware of, I
> would reject his suggestion that "longer ilia means [sic] larger thigh
> muscles." We do not have any direct evidence as to the mass of the
> musculature of the muscles...
The mass of the musculature of the muscles? What were my fingers thinking?