[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Taxa nomy (and intro)
--- SeanSt8579@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 3/11/04 11:46:01 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> email@example.com writes:
> << Oh yes, it has such problems, because it requires that every species is
> in a genus. For example, it is impossible to assign the ancestor of any two
> genera to a monophyletic genus. Assign it to one or the other of its
> descendants, and that genus is then paraphyletic; give it a genus of its
> own, and that genus is doubly paraphyletic; lump all three into one genus,
> and you've merely moved the problem. >>
> Hmm...I don't get it.
> Suppose we have some assemblage [(X+Y) + (A + B)], where the letters are
> species. Why can't I name monophyletic group X + Y Genus1 (with X Genus1
> and Y Genus1 species2), and monophyletic group A + B Genus2 -- the whole
> shabang put into a family?
You're forgetting the ancestors. All four species are descended from one
ancestral species; what Genus does that go into?
=====> T. Michael Keesey <http://dino.lm.com/contact>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for faster