[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: coelurosauravus revisited
David Marjanovic wrote:
6. The affinities of Coelurosauravus are still an open question. The
metacarpals and metatarsals decrease in length laterally from II to V.
When we find another taxon with this pattern, we might have a clue.
Why can't that be an autapomorphy?
I agree with David wholeheartedly. Can we get away from the mindset that
one weird feature can disqualify a taxon's membership of a clade? Czerkas
tried this stunt in his "phylogeny" of theropods, and put forward all sorts
of weird ideas about the evolution of theropod hands.
So what if _Coleurosauravus_ has a weird metapodial morphology? Many other
characters put _Coelurosauravus_ close to _Longisquama_ and drepanosaurids,
at the base of the Diapsida.
7. The hands and feet, to no one's suprise, appear to be webbed.
You mean "to everyone's surprise". What for would an arboreal animal need
webbings that I at least can't see in the bad photo?
I'm not surprised. If webbing is indeed present in _Coelurosauravus_ (and
I'm not saying that it is), then it would make sense for a gliding animal.
Flying frogs (e.g., _Rhacophorus_) have webbed hands and feet, and so do
many other aerial gliding animals that launch themselves from trees.
Colugos (flying lemurs) have an interdigital patagium, and are called
"mitten gliders" for this reason.
BTW, any one know WHY this beastie is actually called _Coelurosauravus_? I
much prefer the junior synonym _Daedalosaurus_; but, alas, the name
_Coelurosauravus_ has priority.
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement