[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Good day dear DML members,
I have some problems with Adasaurus materials. I know that there is an
excellent mail to DML of Mickey Mortimer about
Adasaurus(dml.cmnh.org/2000Sep/msg00191.html). But I still have problems.
According to Barsbold, 1983 (I haven t got this reference yet so I use the
Holotype: IGM 100/20: incomplete skull and remains of the postcranial
skeleton; upper Campanian early Maastrichtian, Nemegtskaya Svita; Bugin-Tsav
*Referred materiall: IGM 100/51 the hindlimbs and remains of the postcranial
skeleton (lacking the anterior portion); upper Campanian early Maastrichtian,
?Nemegtskaya Svita; ?Bugin-Tsav locality.
[IGM 100/20 is also a holotype of Conchoraptor gracilis, IGM 100/51 is a
referred specimen of Alectrosaurus]
* - IGM 100/51 could be a new dromaeosaurid but not Adasaurus cause nothing
common were found within this two specimens.
According to Currie and Varricchio, 2003
IGM 100/20: (p. 128).
IGM 100/22: skull & mandibles with teeth number 4-11-13 (pp. 116,128).
IGM 100/23: (p. 128).
[IGM 100/22 is also a specimen of Conchoraptor]
Look, nothing about IGM 100/51 [O.K. I understand this article is about
cranial anatomy but+].
Could someone give me any information about IGM 100/22 and 100/23. May be
there is something new about Adasarurus at the second edition of the Dinosauria?
P.S. Could someone send me any pictures of Adasaurus? All that I have is the
illustration from The Dinosauria from the first edition.
Thanks a lot in advance,