[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
David Peters (email@example.com) wrote:
<Does anyone have the latest on Lagerpeton? I've got the JVP article by
Sereno and Arcucci. Cladistic analysis puts it no where near Marasuchus.>
1993 is the lastest time it has been treated in such depth. Though
Arcucci (1997) did some work on the Chañares fauna when she described
*Pseudolagosuchus,* not much else that isn't available in, say Currie and
Padian's 1997 _Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs_ that would otherwise change the
Given the high level of scrutiny being applied here, would it be
possible to get the specifics on these cladistic analyses? Challenges to
recent work would serve to be based on something that can be examined, if
but for the purpose of scientific rebuttal (if the data withstands
scrutiny). In the meantime, was Benton's 1999, Sereno's 1999, and Sereno
and Arcucci's 1993 data incorporated into the database by which such
challenges have come forth?
Jaime A. Headden
Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to making leaps
in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to do. We should all
learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world around us rather than zoom by it.
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
- From: David Peters <firstname.lastname@example.org>