[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The Holy of Holies... Dinosauria II
HP Carpenter wrote:
don't forget the abnormally long diastema.
I'm not entirely convinced that the "diastema" (I really don't think this
term should be used, since it normally refers to a gap in a toothrow...) is
really that much bigger relative to skull length than in annectens. I'm not
sure there is enough data to say for certain, but the 4 data points I have
suggest that the edentulous oral margin of copei is the appropriate length
relative to skull length for an annectens.
HP Holtz wrote:
The third possibility is a two genus solution a la Wright and Lull, with
Edmontosaurus regalis and Anatosaurus annectens and Anatosaurus copei
(assuming the phylogeny is indeed regalis + (annectens + copei)).
Or, for those of us who hate genera, nested clades: Edmontosaurus including
regalis and Anatosaurus, Anatosaurus including annectens and copei.
Personally, I think this is a little much, but that's because I hate genera.