[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Paper on drepanosaurids

Christopher Taylor wrote:

Amongst the conclusions: Drepanosaurids are stem group diapsids, not
archosauromorphs, and not related to prolacertiformes. Archaeopteryx,
Ornitholestes and Sinosauropteryx were included in the analysis to test the
Feducci-oid theory that birds are derived from Avicephala - they're not.

In Senter's analysis _Longisquama_ falls right out of the Archosauriformes, a long long way from birds. Still, I don't think this sounds the death-knell for the loopy idea that birds evolved from an animal closely related to _Longisquama_, since aherents of this idea eschew cladistic methodology.

I think it's great that the bizarre gliding reptile _Coelurosauravus_ is coming out near the drepanosaurids. _Coelurosauravus_ has a lateral gliding membrane supported by long bony rods of dermal origin in the thoracolumbar region.

Forgive my ignorance, but what sort of a beastie is _Mesosuchus_?

_Mesosuchus_ is a basal rhynchosaur, I believe.


       |        |--+--Longisquama
       |        |  `--Coelurosauravus
       |        `--Drepanosauridae
          `--+--Gephyrosaurus (for Lepidosauria)
                `--+--Prolacertiformes (incl. Tanystropheidae)

    Forgive my ignorance, but what sort of a beastie is _Mesosuchus_?

Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/