[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Origin of the Palaeognathous Pallet

A number of functional and neotany studies of the Palaeognathous Pterogoid-Palatinum Complex (PPC) by S.W.S. Gussekloo are now available on-line. My favorite at the moment:

I believe that this is his thesis, the actual reference being: Gussekloo S.W.S. (2000) The Evolution of the Palaeognathous Birds, Functional Morphology and Evolutionary Patterns. Thesis, Leiden University Netherlands. Most of the information in his thesis was published in later papers (some listed at the end of this post).

?In this thesis is an attempt is made to solve the question where in avian phylogeny and how in avian evolution the bifucation between Neognathae and Palaeognathae took place.?

Among the conclusions of this study, and others:

1) The ratites represent a separate solution to pallet detachment, and thus are a separate branch of evolution from the Neognathae.
2) There are large differences in the morphology of the Palaeognathae pallet and the embryonic stages of a neognathous chicken, indicating a non-neotenous origin of ratites.
3) The PPC of the Tinamous is approximately half way between the palaeognathous and the neognathous conditions, and contains all of the critical elements of both. (Future studies seem to modify this slightly).
4) The Palaeognathae are the most basal group in modern birds and the sister group of all other living birds.(I?m not sure that this is actually proven here).


Also of interest, Zweers et al (1997) hypothesized that after achieving a lateral bar reducing, skull flexing fenestration, fossil PPCs evolved into three separate lineages of palate detachment evolution:
1) A non-kinetic (akinetic) Dromaeosauro-/Archaeoptery-/Enantiornithomorph lineage.
2) A (pre)-rhynchokinetic (pre-kinetic) Ornithomimio-/Hesperornitho-/Ratitomorph (now called Palaeognathous) lineage.
3) A (pre)-prokenetic Troodonto-/Neognathomorph (now called Neognathous) lineage.
Birds are found in the later two.

Gussekloo refines this into:
1) An Akinetic (no kinetic) Dromaeosauridae lineage
2) A Pre-kinetic Ornithomimidae/Troodontidae lineage
2) A Kinetic (Avialae) lineage, the basal member of which resembles the Tinamou, and which contains all of the elements required for a split into Palaeognathae and Neognathae. The kinetic lineage could have evolved from any of the previously mentioned lineages.

Zweer had hypothisized that a possible biting force improvement on the upper and lower bill enabled in the kinetic Palaeognathous lineage had allowed this particular morphology to survive the K-T boundary. The current study finds no increase in said biting force enabled by the Palaeognathous pallet, but still suggests that the pallet may have been a factor in the extinction event by allowing the upper bill to resist external forces (while grazing on tough foliage).

(Although bill flexibility may have been an extinction factor, I would think that egg-laying strategy would also have been critical to survive the K-T; and statistically, diminutive size seems to be important in most extinction events). Perhaps a bill that can probe for grubs (such as that possessed by the kiwi and some of the Lithornidae) may also have been a useful structure.

Related studies available on-line:
Gussekloo, S. W. S., Vosselman, M. G. & Bout, R. G. 2001

S.W.S. Gussekloo and R.G. Bout. 2002:

I?m not asking anyone to waste too much time on this, but what do you think?


Evan Robinson


Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/