[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: really big question

From: Cliff Green <dinonaut@emerytelcom.net>

However, I still don't think everyone exactly got my point. The
pelecanimimus discription, provided By Ralph Miller says that birds where
found on the site with feather impressions. Fish where found with scale and
internal tissue preservation. Pelecanimimis was found with skin, tissue, and
keritaneous preservation, and no, repeat no plumage impressions. Saying that
with all the other animals at the site having this amazing amount of
preservation, and Pelicanimimis's feathers not showing up because of bad
preservation is at best, miraculous.

I guess the big question is whether EVERY bird and EVERY fish found at the site preserves feathers or scales. If just one bird, for example, was preserved without feathers, it presents the possibility that maybe the supposed feathers of _Pelecanimimus_ weren't preserved either.
Just taught (as in I taught I taw a puddy tat).

Jordan Mallon

Undergraduate Student, Carleton University
Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoecology

Paleoart website: http://www.geocities.com/paleoportfolio/
MSN Messenger: j_mallon@hotmail.com

Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.