[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Advances in Vertebrate Paleontology "Hen to Panta"
I disagree, because both versions are in the original paper. So there is no
problem of emendation, just one of choosing.
Oopsie. Is the one famous occurrence without h in a caption? Then the above
is wrong. But the 2nd phenomenon still kicks in: The _editor_ is the author
of the spelling with h, _not_ Currie et al.. "*Richardoestesia gilmorei*
anonymous vide Currie, Rigby & Sloan 1990".
Because there is no opportunity for choosing, no First Revisor is needed. I
haven't seen a convincing rebuttal to