[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Giraffatitan (was Re: [email@example.com: 52nd SVPCA meeting])
> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:10:05 -0500
> From: "Tim Williams" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> My understanding is that, as a subgenus, _Giraffatitan_ is
> automatically eligible to be a valid name for a genus.
Is this an ICZN rule?
> Many sauropod workers have remarked (in print) that there are no
> unique derived features shared by _B. altithorax_ (from the
> Morrison) and _B. brancai_ (a Tendaguru species).
> Having said that, I don't know if anyone has EXPLICITLY proposed the
> name _Giraffatitan brancai_.
... apart from George Olshevsky.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <email@example.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ Archosaurs rule!
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio