[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: What group has the most work that needs to be done?
Cerapod? But anyway, who uses Cerapoda anymore?
You mean Neornithischia, right?
Cerapoda is a much better name. :-)
My comment about *Hypsilophodon* is oversimplified for a reason. We have
detailed osteological information that shows its gradient relative to
thyreophorans and ornithopodans.
OK. But we have similar amounts of information that shows that _lots_ of
known species fit into this space.
and what about tenontosaurs?
The problem is getting out of a phylogenetic tree
extensive enough to comprise them all in sufficient resolution with enough
character sampling than some of the recent "hand claded"-sized trees
we've been getting from Godefroit, etc. [...] this part of the
is still "choppy" and "pick and choose."
That's what I mean.
So while we know what *Hypsilophodon foxii* is, we do not know precisely
_where_ it is, phylogenetically speaking.
And this means we don't know all that well what it is. We don't know its
autapomorphies -- its evolutionary history.