[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
When is a synonymisation not a synonymisation? (Was: Bakker's Brontosaurus and Late Cretaceous populations)
> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:00:48 -0500
> From: Tim Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Ah, thanks for that correction. I can't find the reference for
>> [the synonymisation of _Cathetosaurus_ with _Camarasaurus_] -- do
>> you have it?
> It's just an abstract, to a presentation at the 1992 SVP meeting.
> It won't tell you anything the (very long) 1996 paper by the same
> authors won't tell you.
Well, this raises an important point -- what counts as a legitimate
synonymisation? We wouldn't accept the erection of a new genus or
species in an abstract, so why accept the sinking of an existing one?
That doesn't sound right to me.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <email@example.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "It's great that we clicked so meanly into the groove as we
entered the run-in, just as we did last season. But the run-in
starts mid-August" -- Paul Tomkins.
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio