[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: What're Rebbachisaurids? (was - New Nemegtosaurus paper)
Rodlox R <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
out of curiosity, what're the Rebbachisaurids like?
Rebbachisaurids are a family of diplodocoids, perhaps most similar to
dicraeosaurids, and so far known only from the Cretaceous of Africa and
South America. They were rather conservative (at least postcranially) and
appear to be basal to dicraeosaurids and diplodocids; for example, they lack
the "whiplash" tail and bifid neural spines seen in these groups. One of
the more characteristic features of rebbachisaurids is the broad
"paddle-shaped" scapular blade. The family Rebbachisauridae currently
includes _Rebbachisaurus_, _Limaysaurus_, _Rayososaurus_, _Nigersaurus_, and
some unnamed specimens. _Nigersaurus_ is distinctive for its rather
ornithischian-like dental battery, with over 600 slender teeth packed into
The dentary assigned to _A. wichmannianus_ by Huene may also be from a
rebbachisaurid, and _A. wichmannianus_ has been suggested by some authors
(e.g., Sereno et al., 1999) to be a chimera based on the presence of a
rather rebbachisaurid-like lower jaw combined with a titanosaur-like
braincase. However, the undoubted titanosaur _Bonitasaura_, which is based
on a partially articulated skeleton, has a dentary similar to that of _A.
wichmannianus_ (Apesteguia, 2004). So _A. wichmannianus_ may not be a
composite species, but 100% titanosaur.
(were they armor-plated like the Titanosaurs?)
Not that we know of.
why didn't Brachiosaurids, Dicraeosaurids, and Diplodocoids diversify?
They had a lousy financial adviser.
Seriously, diplodocoids did diversify in the Cretaceous, in the form of the
rebbachisaurids - although they were overshadowed by the more abundant
titanosaurs. It appears that diplodocids and camarasaurids went extinct at
the end of the Jurassic, and dicraeosaurids, brachiosaurids and some others
(e.g., _Aragosaurus_) lingered into the earlier Cretaceous. It is possible
that the success of rebbachisaurids and titanosaurs had something to with
the change in vegetation, and the shift from the gymnosperm-dominated
"Mesophytic" flora to the angiosperm-dominated "Cenophytic" flora - but this
is speculative. Certainly, titanosaurs were the dominant herbivorous
saurischians in the Late Cretaceous.