[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Mesozoic biomass
Entire e-mail repeated because it came with the truncation message attached:
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: Mesozoic biomass
>In essence, it is like the African savannahs with size of predators and
>magnified by a factor of 5-10. So were number of predators & prey 1/5
>1/10 of Holocene norms?
I think that would be our best bet. A more precise factor could be
by evaluating whether 1) the Mesozoic ecosystem you're studying was
or poorer in plant material than the African savannah and 2) how much
the dinos were as an average.
And then the population sizes and densities of the dinos... :-S
I fear that extending this mode of thinking to the whole planet would
to freakingly approximative calculations. As has already been said, after
good estimate is known for a few significant ecosystems (could the
considered as an individual "ecosystem"? Bakker used to consider whole
formations as ecosystems in Dino Heresies, but I fear this is not a very
approach), little more than relative estimations could be done.
A year ago or something (is it perhaps in Mesozoic Vertebrate Life???) I
remember reading an article by Bakker and some others about a
"criminalistic" approach to investigating several ecosystems within the
Morrison Fm by investigating isolated teeth and fish scales. Includes the
idea that *Ceratosaurus* hunted lungfish -- 4 m long lungfish.