[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
U've been really busy the last few days, so apologies if this was already
presented to the list...
Sereno's database of proposed clades is up in a provisional form that covers
stem archosaurs. It's quite useful for finding the phylogenetic definitions
that have been proposed for clades.
However, I have issues with which clades are presented as "active". It's
basically the clades Sereno uses. So Tyrannoraptora is active, despite
having an uncertain content (does it include compsognathids? Ornitholestes?
arctometatarsalians?) and being rarely used in the literature outside of
Sereno's works. But Carnosauria is inactive, because he prefers to use
Allosauroidea in order to avoid historical baggage and because
non-allosauroid carnosaurians are disputed. Despite the widespread use of
Carnosauria, in such influential works as The Dinosauria 2nd ed..
Similarly, Eusaurischia is inactive seemingly because Sereno thinks proposed
non-eusaurischian saurischians are theropods. But one point of phylogenetic
nomenclature is that is works with alternative topologies. Just because one
person finds a clade to be taxonomically redundant does not mean it should
be made inactive. Ornithuromorpha is inactive, while Euornithes is active,
which I don't think reflects the frequency of their use in publications.
Regardless, it's also useful for learning the revised definitions to be
published by Sereno in his upcoming JVP article. He seems to have made
Unenlagiinae more useful, for instance. See Taxon Search for yourself here-