[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Tim Williams (email@example.com) wrote:
<I thought the name "Rhynchocephalia" referenced the rhynchosaurs, which
were once thought to be allied to the tuatara and friends
Rhynchocephalia is often used as the of Squamata, in which case if
Rhynchosauria (including *Hyperodapedon*) is an ally of tuataras, then
Rhynchosauria belongs to the Rhynchocephalia. Otherwise, the rest have
been termed Sphenodontia, which to my knowledge it held to be a node based
group including Clevosauridae, Pleurosauridae, Sapheodontidae, and
Sphenodontidae. So there isn't really a 1:1 correllation, but sometimes
Darren Naish had this rant (Rhynchocephalia-hatin') way back in 1997:
"[...]Olivier Rieppel recently re-defined a Rhynchocephalia to include
Sphenodontida/Sphenodontia and a related genus (dammit I've forgotten
that name too..). No thanks. I've had it to here with rhychocephalians.
If people see it used again, they will continue associating
(which are archosauromorphs) with tuataras (which are lepidosaurs).
Maybe I should cut down on the coffee."
Hope this helps and clears the confusion. Yes, I see the physical jaw
similarities with basal rhynchosaurs and sphenodonts, too, but they seem
allied to archosaurs....
Jaime A. Headden
Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to making leaps
in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to do. We should all
learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world around us rather than zoom by it.
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.