[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> From: david peters [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Hmm. That's a strange pair.
> It doesn't make sense with what I know.
If evolution were solely revealed by ecomorphotypes, no, it wouldn't. But since
phylogeny is better reconstructed by the recognizing
descent with modification in more than just the grossly obvious characters, we
have to look at all the critters' details. And that's
where this "seemingly unnatural marriage" (to quote John) is manifested.
> Merck 1997 is cited a half dozen times according to Google. I assume this is
> the abstract.
> David Peters
Merck 1997 is the disseration; the SVP presentation was in 2003.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
Building 237, Room 1117
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796>