[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: SVP Ethics statement
so let me ask you this then.....
as knightia are very common, as with diplomystus and priscacara, and a few
other Green River fish...would you allow someone who leased a quarry in
Wyoming and sold only these common fish to be a member of the SVP? Or if he
was one already, continue to be one with his current profession?
would this tolerance be shared by other members of the SVP?
which fossils would be considered common enough to be allowed to sell?
Your attitude seems to be a little more progressive than other members of
the SVP I have run into.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Marjanovic" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "DML" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: SVP Ethics statement
While I can't blame the shop staff I can wonder why the museum management
would allow this.
Because *Knightia* is as common there as *Lycoptera* in Liaoning. There
are _millions_ of it per... hectare perhaps.