[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [toni.naish@btinternet.com: Alamosaurus a nomen dubium?]

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: [toni.naish@btinternet.com: Alamosaurus a nomen dubium?]
From: Danvarner@aol.com
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:39:15 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-to: Danvarner@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 7/15/2005 3:06:05 PM Eastern  Standard Time, 
mike@miketaylor.org.uk quotes Darren:
<< By analogy, the  giant predatory bird _Phorusrhacos_ is ALWAYS (pretty 
much) restored with black  and white plumage. Why? Well, because that's how it 
was first depicted by Zdenek  Burian! Ah, the burden of history. >>

Actually,  that should be Chas.R.Knight:
http://www.50birds.com/images/extbPhororhacosapcrk.jpg

Although I think both artworks are basically monochrome. DV

Prev by Date: Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveries)
Next by Date: Hydrogen fusion killed the dinosaurs?
Previous by thread: [toni.naish@btinternet.com: Alamosaurus a nomen dubium?]
Next by thread: Oviraptords new refs.
Indexes: