[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Chinese fossil finds
Probably if we could establish a joint venture studies here in Brazil,
we could came up with wonderful discoveries too.
In the south there is the Santa Maria Formation which could shed light
on the origin and early radiation of dinosaurian lineages:
Saurischia/Ornithischia split; Theropoda/Sauropodomorpha split and so
on. (Well, Bonaparte, Salgado, Coria, and others are doing a great
work in Argentina anyway.) I'll be suspicious about Chinese
discoveries only if those question was illuminated there. (Well, okay,
there was the /Archaeoraptor/ fake... but others fossils seems to be
real. All in all, every palaeontological branch must have its own
In the Araripe there is a great potencial Cretaceous pterosaurs
diversity to be found.
In the midway there are some Jurassic deposits scattered. I guess that
a very different dinosaurian fauna remains to be discovered here:
abelisaurid and charcharodontosaurid diversity, titanosaurid diversity
Too many works to do, so few researchers (and fundings too - Brazil is
not much famous by investment in science, let alone palaeontology).
2005/7/20, Steve Kary <email@example.com>:
> Is it just me or do the Chinese/Mongolian fossil deposits
> seem to come up with fossils of stunning quality that answer
> very specific questions (ie. Dinosaur sleeping position) more
> or less a few years after the question is asked? Also, they
> seem to be getting a chunk of every great fossil find, be
> it dinosaurs, Chengjiang or otherwise. Why is this?
> I just find alot of the stuff coming out of those places
> (especially China) to be highly coincidental and very well
> timed...Are their deposits REALLY that good/lucky or are
> they sitting on discoveries for years until the proper moment
> to unveil it with stunning effects to the world? Perhaps a
> Chinese fossil conspiracy involving millions of workers lives
> and fake fossils (just kiddin').