[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: new dinosaurs
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Tim Williams
> I wrote:
> >I have not yet seen the JVP paper (though I would dearly love to), but the
> >cladogram in _Dinosauria II_ shows that _Appalachiosaurus_ and
> >_Dryptosaurus_ come up in different parts of the Tyrannosauroidea tree. The
> >"Alabama taxon" (= _Appalachiosaurus_) belongs on the
> >_Albertosaurus_-_Gorgosaurus_ line of the Tyrannosauridae, whereas
> >_Dryptosaurus_ is given as a basal tyrannosauroid. Any similarities between
> >the two are presumably symplesiomorphic.
> Scratch that. According to the JVP paper, both _Dryptosaurus_ and
> _Appalachosaurus_ are basal tyrannosauroids - though certainly distinct.
Just wanted to add that putting Dilong into my matrix pulled Appalachiosaurus
out of Albertosaurinae, and Tyrannosauridae, and put
it in the position that Carr et al. found.
That being said, the Albertosaurinae characters listed in DinoII are indeed
present in Appa., so a return to that position is not
out of the question.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
Building 237, Room 1117
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796