[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Martin 2004 critique
Phil Bigelow wrote:
Maybe I'm a bit naive, but I doubt that most journal editors would cut
Martin any slack just because he holds a minority viewpoint. So, either
_AZS_ has no review process at all or its reviewers just rubber stamp
submitted manuscripts. (?)
Please note that this is *not* an attack on Martin. Still, it is clear
that something in the system failed.
I agree that it is a dreadful paper. However, I don't think this is an
example of how the "system failed". The same issue of _Acta Zoologica
Sinica_ also features an article by Sereno that argues that birds indeed
evolved from dinosaurs (and so *are* dinosaurs). The editors were probably
just trying to be even-handed.