[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New PaleoBios paper - diplodocoid phylogenetic taxonomy
> All those names for basal avialan and non-neornithine clades confuse
> the bejesus out of me:
Calm down. Some of them have only one definition! :^)
- Node-based, Neornithes(*) + *Patagopteryx* (which probably means that
*Vorona* is outside -- when that definition was published, it was in a
trichotomy with *Patagopteryx* and the rest of Euornithes).
- Node-based, Neornithes + *Patagopteryx* + *Vorona*. Same known contents
(*) Or some member thereof. I'm typing off the top of my head.
Node-based, *Iberomesornis* + Neornithes. Since *I.* has turned out to
belong to Enantiornithes, Ornithothoraces forms a node-stem triplet with
Enantiornithes and Euornithes.
Node-based, *Confuciusornis* + Neornithes.
AFAIK not defined.
At least two:
- Node-based: *Ichthyornis* + Neornithes.
- Apomorphy-based: keel on sternum in all members of the population (so
*Confuciusornis* is just outside).
Kurochkin used Euornithiformes, not Euornithes, so let's stick with Sereno
(1998 -- not 1999), who (this time) made a really good decision:
Stem-based: Neornithes inside, *Sinornis santensis* outside.
Of course he could have used *Enantiornis* instead of *Sinornis*, but
currently this doesn't make any practical difference.
IIRC only defined by Sereno (1998), as the mirror image of Euornithes.
Stem-based: *Sinornis santensis* inside, *Iberomesornis romerali* outside.
Am I waiting for the enantiornithine phylogeny that will be presented at
this year's SVP meeting, where I won't be...
It's good you didn't mention Ornithurae. That name is real horror, with 5
definitions or suchlike.
GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis!
2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl