[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Pterosaurs and birds, was Re: birds and pterosaurs
Very interesting thought. However, as was already mentioned via
Argentavis, there have been some truly large birds as well (far larger
than extant forms). Some pseudodontorns, for example, had wingspans
around 7 meters across.
I'm not sure what you mean by scaling in the "flesh" part of wing; the
amount of muscle and connective tissue is indeed important to the mass
of the wing, but growing a wing especially long generally requires
longer bones, longer associated muscles, and longer feathers (ie. all
structures increase in length). Also, feathers are very light, and
larger feathers do not necessarily scale as quickly in mass as might be
expected, because they are hollow structures (and can be made with thin
keratin walls at large sizes). Does anyone know how feather mass
scales with length?
Feather moults usually occur in a staggered fashion, so this helps to
alleviate the problem of balancing replacement and the need for a
suitable airfoil at all times. Still, the point is interesting, and I
wonder what the variation in feather growth rate is across birds.
After all, feather growth rates and wing weight would have to be
limiting at some size, the question is whether this size would be above
or below the limits by mass alone. If we can get some scaling
equations worked out for feather weight, wing weight, and feather
growth it might be a viable thing to work out. First thing to do is
check if it's actually been done already; time to hit the literature...
On Saturday, October 8, 2005, at 03:23 PM, Jorge Dichenberg wrote:
Just to hijack the thread.
I learned that flight feathers of large soaring birds
grow slowly, ca. 1mm/day. This means that largest
flight-feathers of vultures and pelicans take 3-4
months to grow.
I suspect that feather length and not body mass is
limiting size of flying birds.
Bird needs to replace flight feather by moult at least
every 2 years, cannot lose too many feathers without
becoming flightless, cannot feed while flightless (I
talk about specialised flying scavengers and
fisheaters) and thick base of feather means that
extending wing by growing the flesh part of wing
results in very heavy wing. Ergo - there is some limit
of bird wingspan.
Possibly for very large flying animals, wing membranes
are more efficent than feathers, models of animal
flight based on largest birds are biased and
pterosaurs achieved true limit of size of flying
PS. I am aware that ornamental bird feathers are
longer and birds feeding on water plants can become
flightless during moult.
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005